NEW DELHI: Deepinder Goyal, founder and CEO of Temple and founder of Zomato, has defended his new Temple device amid criticism over its pricing and technology claims, clarifying that it is designed as a fitness and artificial intelligence (AI) device and is not intended to diagnose or prevent diseases.
In a social media post, Goyal said the company had not made any medical claims about the device and stressed that it does not replace the need for people to consult doctors. “Temple is strictly a fitness + AI device, and we’ve made no medical claims. Temple is not proven to diagnose or prevent any disease. It doesn’t do anything which replaces the need for you to see a doctor,” he said.
His clarification came after criticism and questions surrounding the device, including its pricing and the scientific evidence supporting its features. Goyal said users were free to wait for further research and reviews before deciding whether to purchase it.
“There are different audiences which buy products at various levels of proof. Proof goes from whitepaper -> pre-print -> peer reviewed. You are free to sit on the fence until peer reviewed proof arrives. You are free to not believe it even then. Nobody is forcing you to buy,” he said.
Hello everyone. Happy Diwali!
Thank you for your criticism, your support and your time over the last two days. Gives me much needed clarity on what we need to explain better:
1. Temple is not made for India. It’s made for the world. Please check pricing. We don’t expect any more than 1% of Temples being sold in India.
2. If you are upset that the pricing is too high, I am sorry. There’s a lot of work that went into Temple, and we priced it at what we think it’s worth. If you think its overpriced, you can wait for user reviews to decide if its worth your money.
3. Please do not support us because we are an Indian startup. We want to compete globally. We don’t need/want nationalist support. Support us if you want to support early innovation, which could help you live a better life, and will continue to add more proof to its science over the years.
4. There are different audiences which buy products at various levels of proof. Proof goes from whitepaper -> pre-print -> peer reviewed. You are free to sit on the fence until peer reviewed proof arrives. You are free to not believe it even then. Nobody is forcing you to buy. Making announcements is our right; and if we overclaim anywhere, we will inevitably fall into regulatory trouble everywhere in the world.
5. We didn’t make any medical claim. Doctors primarily see things from a medical lens, so they see every claim as a medical claim. I repeat – Temple is strictly a fitness + AI device, and we’ve made no medical claims. Temple is not proven to diagnose or prevent any disease. It doesn’t do anything which replaces the need for you to see a doctor.
6. The main point of Temple is NOT Brain Flow. That’s what we just started Temple for, and studies on Brain Flow are the first ones getting out.
7. The main point of Temple is Entropy (I shared the HomeScreen of Temple three months ago with Entropy as the main thing). Our emails to our waitlisted users only talk about Entropy. We haven’t published anything on Entropy yet. We will. If you want to buy Temple before that, please do. If you don’t want to, don’t.
8. Roomdeaf AI is an expansion of the device’s capabilities, and our vision for Temple. It is not a pivot.
9. Social media is not the regulator for Temple. Wherever we need regulatory clearances, we will have them before we make any claim needing them.
10. I will post a detailed note on how we calculate Brain Flow, its uses, and most importantly, its limitations in a bit (tomorrow).
— Deepinder Goyal (@deepigoyal) November 8, 2026
Addressing criticism over the price, Goyal said considerable work had gone into developing Temple and that the company had priced it according to what it believed the product was worth.
“If you are upset that the pricing is too high, I am sorry. There’s a lot of work that went into Temple, and we priced it at what we think it’s worth. If you think its overpriced, you can wait for user reviews to decide if its worth your money,” he said.
Goyal also clarified that Temple was designed for international markets rather than primarily for Indian consumers. He said the company did not expect India to account for more than 1 per cent of the devices sold. “Temple is not made for India. It’s made for the world. Please check pricing. We don’t expect any more than 1% of Temples being sold in India,” he said.
Explaining the technology behind the device, Goyal said Brain Flow was not its main feature. He said the company had started with Brain Flow and that studies on it were the first to be released, while Entropy was the main focus of Temple. “The main point of Temple is Entropy,” he said, adding that the company had not yet published anything on Entropy but planned to do so.
He also said Roomdeaf AI was an expansion of the device’s capabilities and the company’s broader vision for Temple, rather than a change in direction. Goyal said he would publish a detailed note explaining how Brain Flow is calculated, its uses and, importantly, its limitations.
He further said the company wanted to compete globally and did not seek support merely because it was an Indian startup. He said people should support the product if they believed in early innovation that could improve people’s lives. (ANI)
