Real fight between Priya Sachdeva, Karisma Kapoor: Rani Kapur’s lawyer after Delhi HC’s notice

NEW DELHI:Amid the ongoing dispute over late industrialist Sanjay Kapur’s Rs 30,000 crore estate, Rani Kapur’s lawyer said that the “real fight” is actually between the former spouses, Karisma Kapoor and Priya Sachdeva Kapoor, of the late industrialist.

“This fight is really more between Karisma Kapoor and Priya Sachdeva – whether there is a will or there is no will etc. Rani Kapur does get impacted by it but she will file a response and you will know her stand,” Senior Advocate Vaibhav Gaggar, representing late Sunjay Kapur’s mother Rani Kapur said.

He said further that Rani Kapur has been named a defendant in the case due to her being a class 1 heir to the assets of the industrialist, but she has made her stance clear, and it will remain the same.

“She has been made defendant number 3 in her capacity as a class 1 heir of Sanjay Kapur…Now that the matters are coming to court, it would not be appropriate for me to give any further comments. But Mrs Kapur has been quite unequivocal in what her stand has been. It remains the same,” he added.

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday issued notice in a civil suit filed by Bollywood actor Karisma Kapoor’s two children over the Rs 30,000 crore estate of their late father, industrialist Sunjay Kapur, while noting that the siblings had already given Rs 1,900 crore from the family trust.

#WATCH | Delhi High Court heard a plea by Karisma Kapoor’s children seeking a share in their late father Sunjay Kapur’s Rs 30,000 crore estate.

Senior Advocate Vaibhav Gaggar, representing late Sunjay Kapur’s mother Rani Kapur, says, “She has been made defendant number 3 in her… pic.twitter.com/mEl8vmmp95

— ANI (@ANI) September 10, 2025

Justice Jyoti Singh directed Priya Sachdeva Kapur, Sunjay Kapur’s widow, to file a comprehensive list of all movable and immovable assets of the deceased along with her reply.

Summons have been issued, with written statements to be filed in two weeks and replications in one week thereafter. Replies to the interim relief plea must also be filed in two weeks, with rejoinders in a week. The matter will be taken up next on October 9 for consideration of an ad-interim injunction.

“Once I register the suit, the doctrine of lis will apply,” Justice Singh observed.

The children, represented through their mother Karisma Kapoor, have alleged that Priya Kapur forged Sunjay Kapur’s will to claim exclusive control of his assets. Senior Advocate Mahesh Jethmalani, for the children, argued that the will is unregistered, was never disclosed earlier, and was read “in haste” at the Taj Hotel.

He further pointed to suspicious circumstances, noting that the executor admitted learning of the will only a day before and that its disclosure came from a family employee.

Senior Advocate Rajiv Nayar, representing Priya Kapur, countered that the suit is not maintainable. He stressed that the plaintiffs are already trust beneficiaries and had given Rs 1,900 crore just days before filing the case. “It’s not as if these people are left on the streets. I am a widow with a six-year-old child. For 15 years, they were nowhere to be seen,” he said.

Sunjay Kapur’s mother, Rani Kapur, also intervened through Senior Advocate Vaibhav Gaggar. “There’s something unholy going on. I am 80 years old, concerned for my grandchildren. A trust set up by me has nothing for me? Despite repeated mails, I never received a copy of the will,” she submitted.

She further alleged that her rights under the trust had been eroded after Priya Kapur’s marriage and raised concerns over the sale of Sona Comstar shares worth Rs 500 crore to a Singapore entity without her knowledge. She urged the Court to maintain the status quo on the estate.

The children, who seek partition of the estate, rendition of accounts, and an injunction against the defendants, claim they were close to their father until his sudden death in Windsor, UK, on June 12.

They allege that despite Sunjay Kapur’s repeated assurances about their financial security, Priya Kapur restricted their access to trust documents and later produced a will dated March 21, which they believe is forged. (ANI)