Supreme Court bars unauthorised sharing and monetisation of court proceedings

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Friday barred the unauthorised extraction, editing, uploading, reposting or dissemination of live-streamed court proceedings on social media and other digital platforms without prior permission of the Secretary General of the Supreme Court or the Registrar General of the concerned High Court.

A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, in its interim order, further said the Secretary General of the Supreme Court and the Registrars General of all High Courts are to upload the directions on their respective official websites. It clarified that the directions will not affect news reporting of court proceedings

The bench also issued notice to the Centre and all state governments on a petition seeking to curb the unauthorised extraction, dissemination, and monetisation of videos of court proceedings on social media and other digital platforms. It also sought a report from the High Courts on the adoption of rules to regulate the live-streaming of courtroom hearings.

The Supreme Court has issued fresh guidelines requiring prior permission before audio-video recordings of court proceedings can be posted, reposted, or uploaded on social media and other digital platforms. The move aims to address concerns over the unauthorised circulation of… pic.twitter.com/hF7TsWD8qr

— DD News (@DDNewslive) July 24, 2026

“As an interim measure, we direct that there shall be no posting, reposting, extraction, modification, dissemination, monetisation of the live-streamed proceedings of courts on social media or any other digital platform without the prior permission of the concerned Registrar and the Secretary General of this court and Registrar General of High Courts,” the bench ordered.

The apex court passed the order on a PIL filed by one Harshita Grover seeking guidelines to regulate the clipping, editing, dissemination and monetisation of audio-visual recordings of court proceedings on digital platforms.

During the hearing, the senior advocate Vikas Singh, appearing for the petitioner, said that the plea was not opposed to the live-streaming of court proceedings. Instead, he raised concerns over the unauthorised extraction, editing, and circulation of court hearing clips on social media, arguing that such misuse distorted proceedings and warranted regulation. He pointed out the instances where selective clips of hearings had gone viral.

Justice Bagchi called for rethinking of livestreaming, asserting that action should be an exception rather than a norm. “I don’t think it is fair to expect livestreamings of all courts for all times to come,” Justice Bagchi said, adding that it is difficult to manage the circulation of such live-streams once it is uploaded to the public domain. He said that courtroom hearings “cannot be reduced to entertainment that belittles the justice system”.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta cautioned that advances in artificial intelligence have made it possible to manipulate courtroom videos. He warned that AI could alter the words spoken by judges and lawyers while preserving realistic lip movements, posing a serious risk of misinformation.

The Solicitor General also said that the clips from the livestream are selectively extracted, and a particular narrative is given, distorting the proceedings.

The Chief Justice agreed that misinformation stemming from distorted reporting was a growing concern. The CJI observed that even some of his own remarks had been misrepresented in the print media, reiterating the concern he had expressed earlier in the day over inaccurate reports relating to the plea on the student protest issue.

“The best and most recent example is from the day before yesterday. In the morning, a mention was made seeking listing of a particular petition. Yet, till 10 am today, no such petition has even been filed,” the CJI said. (ANI)